This thematic cluster examines how individual and collective emotional responses to COVID-19 were deeply embedded in local socio-political contexts. This theme demonstrates how specific feelings became central and acceptable to state responses and political projects, revealing the role of affect in governing populations during the pandemic.
Curated thematic collection on COVID-19 and mental health
During the COVID-19 pandemic, public and academic discourse on mental health was frequently framed in pathological terms, emphasising psychological damage and the need for intervention. However, critical and contextual explorations of the pandemic’s psychological impact reveal far more diverse perspectives, showing that experiences of distress, coping, and well-being were shaped by local histories, socio-political conditions, and cultural frameworks rather than universal psychiatric categories alone.
This thematic collection brings together psychiatric, anthropological, and non-scientific publications, as well as mental health–related narratives, which engage with the psychological effects of COVID-19. Rather than presenting a singular account of the “pandemic mental health”, the collection offers curated excerpts that illustrate the varied ways psychological experiences of the pandemic were conceptualised, constructed, and influenced by social, cultural, and political variables within different national contexts.
The materials focus on five countries which constituted the project’s case studies – China, Colombia, Ghana, Nigeria, and Russia – and are organised thematically to foreground both shared concerns and contextual differences.
Importantly, this collection presents research and materials that go beyond English-language journals and Global North academic centres.
Themes
Together, these themes demonstrate that the psychological impact of COVID-19 cannot be understood outside its cultural, historical, and political contexts. The database offers a valuable resource for mental health researchers, humanities scholars, and public health professionals interested in the diversity of pandemic experiences and the multiple ways psychological distress, resilience, and recovery were imagined and enacted across different settings.